For a few years now, there’s been two things I wanted to experience in Japan… 1) go to a sumo wrestling event and 2) go see a Hatsune Miku concert and find out how that works and what the big deal is. So when we were making plans for this trip and found out that Hatsune Miku was going to be ‘playing’ in Brisbane literally the day we get home from Japan, it kinda felt like we had to go.
For anyone who happens to stumble accidentally over my dribble driven blog, and is unfamiliar with Hatsune Miku, the whole thing is totally weird, and also very typically Japanese. Hatsune Miku is a Vocaloid (a vocaloid is a like a digital software voicebank, in this case one that was developed by a company called Crypton Future, which is capable of talking and singing entirely with a large pre-reordered database of vocal data). Hatsune Miku is officially known as CV01, and is a likeness of a 16 year old Japanese girl with extremely long turquoise hair that she wears in huge long pigtails. The personification of Hatsune Miku has been very cleverly marketed and branded and is effectively a virtual rockstar or teen idol? The representation of Hatsune Miku perform at “live virtual concerts” (oxymoronic much?) on a stage as a high tech animated holographic projection. The image is rear projected on a special glass screen… so we are effectively all here to watch a big TV screen with a pretend pop star playing a pre-recorded show that is synced to live music; cos yes, there’s a back up band!
Yale and I had really good seats actually, we were in the stalls, probably about 25 rows deep. We got a great view of the hologram, and it afforded us an opportunity to really observe the crowd – which I found quite twice as fascinating as the show. I did feel like I was Jane Goodall amongst her subjects though, just completely fascinated by how enthralled and engaged the audience was with this ‘artist’.
Cos Hatsune Miku is computer generated, I got AI to create me a selfie of me as Jane Goodall observing the concert… stupid AI wouldn’t make me into an age appropriate Jane Goodall though, would it?! But other than the grey hair and the obvious wrinkles, yeah not a bad representation.
The music was largely unfamiliar to me, if you want to see Hatsune Miku videos, there’s heaps of them on YouTube, and it’s all super poppy, with high pitched young squeaky voices… not my thing at all – which is probably evident when you consider the only other concerts I’ve been to this year are Rammstein and the Hu..!
She (I don’t know?! Can you misgender a holographic vocaloid?) also had a bunch of holographic vocaloid friends that were part of the show too (I’m reluctant to say they ‘performed’, for obvious reasons!). So I spent the show watching the quality of the display, but also watching the crowd, and they were soooo into this!
My iPhone coped really well with the lighting conditions, the projection and the 30m or so to the state to get some great renderings of the rendering!
Hatsune Miku is a cultural phenomenon in Japan, I would have loved to be able to go to one of these shows in Japan to see how over the top the crowd was, but I imagine, in order to be right up in the middle of it, I would have totally bawked at the cost of tickets. As it is, we were surrounded by fans who had the offical Hatsune Miku Glowsticks that look like this:
They sell for AUD$60 each and were sold out FIVE HOURS before the concert started! They’re literally a strange little torch with LED light/s that have a colour changing function. And (this was the weird bit to me), every single one of the fans who had these Glowsticks knew exactly what colour to change their Glowsticks to for each song *and* they all knew a routine of movements for waving their Glowsticks that went with each different song!
There were some who didn’t have Glowsticks that literally filmed the entire show from beginning to end, and I don’t think looked up at the stage directly hardly at all…
And there was this lovely lady right beside me who didn’t smile once during the concert, but appeared to be in an almost trance-like state of concentration waving her stick. She was in the zone!
This couple in front of us had bought the VIP Premium ticket that came with a Hatsune Miku souvenir pack containing a Glowstick and a short, lightweight Miku kimono. There was one guy a couple of rows in front of us and a bit to the right, who was wearing a full length Hatsune Miku kimono that obviously was something he owned from a previous event or shopping expedition, who had SIX of the Glowsticks and was holding three in each hand and was almost conducting the audience behind him in keeping everyone’s the actions in synch! It was fascinating to watch how excited these kids were; I’d like to say it was a diverse crowd, but it really wasn’t… it was super saturated with cosplayers and gamer types (and some of their parents playing chaperone!).
There was even some duet acts… I have no idea how they kept the holographic display in synch with the live music, but it all went without a hitch and the holograms looked like they were singing without any lag or hiccoughs.
One thing that was very different from a traditional concert was the speed with which Hatsune Miku and friends could do a costume change! Holey moley there was some quick changes going on! Complete with huge change in hairstyles.
At the end of the show, and two encore songs, there was a huge explosion of streamers from the roof which spooled out like a massive bukkake of white from the ceiling, and had the kids scrambling to try and collect some up to take home!
All up, it was fascinating to attend. There was probably less than 3000 people here, I can’t imagine what seeing this would be like in Japan or Korea with a crowd of tens of thousand. Amazing! Quite the unique cultural experience, and rounding out the end of our trip to Japan really … weirdly, I guess.
So, now I guess I have to try harder to get to some sumo wrestling next time we are in Japan!
Driving from Yugawara to Hakone proper today, up some beautiful winding mountain roads. I noticed from my last trip to Japan that when you’re out and about in a car, and you encounter gorgeous scenery, there are rarely places to pull over and enjoy the view. In Australia, lookouts seem to be everywhere there’s even a slight elevation in the road, along with some big board of information to tell you what you are looking at. Here they seem very few and far between.
Looking back towards Tokyo.
The elusive Mt Fuji! Sadly, without any snow on top… apparently it’s the first time in 130 years there has been no snow on Mt Fuji in October. Signs of rapid climate change are all around us. The hovering low cloud is reminiscent of so many iconic Japanese prints and artworks.
These guys pulled up in their car and at first I was like, ‘Hey! Way to block the view!’, but they have a cute little K-car so we forgive them.
When we arrived in Hakone, we did a quick scout out of the Hakone Checkpoint area. The Hakone Checkpoint was originally an inspection facility during the Edo period (1603-1868) and was dedicated to keeping the city of Edo (Tokyo as was) safe. There were up to 50 checkpoints scattering across the country during this era but most were abandoned when the Edo Period ended. From what I’ve read the Hakone Checkpoint is the only one that has been restored. It was rebuilt and renovated in 2007, using the traditional building tools and techniques from the Edo Period. I am planning on coming back this way in a couple of weeks to visit the site – but so not going near it on a public holiday weekend!
The little shopping street leading up the Checkpoint has many craftsman who create the traditional ‘Yosegi Zaiku’ workwork that has its origins in the mountains of Hakone. The craft has hundreds of years of history and is designated as a special Japanese cultural treasure, and utilises naturally different coloured timber laid out in intricate geometrical designs and patterns to make complex and beautiful timber products.
Hakone Karakuri Musuem – showcases the techniques used to make the Yozegi Zaiku masterpieces. There is a small museum which displays how the history of the techniques date back to the Edo period, and it was as much as 1000 years ago that local craftsmen began to gather in Hakone to take advantage of the wide varieties of wood available in the mountains here. Initially, the timbers were used to create furniture, but around 200 years ago a noted craftsman named Jinbei Ishikawa developed a technique of co-mingling different colours and grains of woods to make boards and then cut them into thin slices of timber veneer. These thin boards containing the intricate designs are then glued to various boxes, trays, coasters and what have you, to create these beautiful marquetry pieces.
Planes used to create the thin slices of timber decorations.
The work is so beautiful, and showcases some serious woodworking talent.
After checking out the marquetry and resisting buying anything to carry around for the rest of the trip, we sought out something fishy for lunch. We found a sushi restaurant near the Checkpoint, called Daimasa Honten. It was rated 4.2 on the Googles, which is damn near impossible in Japan. The Japanese are notoriously harsh on rating restaurants, they will never complain about food they are served, but they have very high standards and seem to often feel, ‘things can always be better!’ Which seems to sit with the Japanese ideals of perfectionism quite nicely. Anyway, if you’re in Tokyo and see a restaurant with over 4 stars aggregate reviews on Google, just know that’s damn near impossible – and you should go there, the food will be amazing. This place however, could just be lucky enough to have lots of western tourists visiting who are more free and easy with their praise!
I chose a unagi and tuna rice bowl, that is supposed to look like a dragon.. and while the picture on the menu was sort of dragon like if you squint at it from the right – mind did not! Nevermind though, it was super fresh and really tasty. So all is good with the world.
Yale ordered a donburi set full of all good things. All up, a delicious meal and for a fairly reasonable price (compared to what we would pay for similar in Australia, though admittedly kinda touristy priced for Japan).
After lunch, we took a drive to get to Kitanozake Saryou, and made a quick detour to a photo point on a small side road near the “Old Tokaidō ROad, Ancient Cedar Avenue”. We managed to get some beautiful views of Lake Ashi towards the famous Hakone Tori Gate, and Mt Fuji in the background. As luck would have it, one of the very touristy and famous pirate ships was coming past and made for some beautiful iconic Japanese photos.
Togendai Station – where the ships come in.
Had to do a quick stop at the konbini for some saké… and I’m always amused at the strangeness available at the local shop. Spam nigiri? Hotdog in a bun complete with ketchup and mustard, and how long has that been sitting in that bag? Yikes!
Yale found this enormous chocolate waffle ice cream monstrosity… don’t let the Yale for scale throw you off, this thing was easily as big as my hand!
While in the area for a few days, we took the opportunity to visit the Hakone Venetian Glass Musuem also known as the Hakone Glass Forest or the Ukai. It is located in Sengokuhara in the Ashigarashimo District and I thought the idea of a Venetian glass museum in Japan was going to be something seriously odd… and well, I always love me a bit of absurdity in the morning.
And all these objects are before you even enter.
This is an Insta-famous archway is made entirely of crystals. It is quite striking when the sun hits it, but today it was quite overcast.
I saw this curly white glass sculpture in the middle of the lake and was immediately reminded of Dale Chihuly’s work… but didn’t think that likely as it was a Venetian glass collection, yes? Only to walk around the corner and find a plaque confirming that yes, it is actually a Chihuly.
The Venetian Art Glass Musuem.
I don’t know what this cascade of glass flowers is called or when it was made – but it was interesting.
Glass perfume bottle in the carriage – Italy, c.1860.
Compote bowl and lid in filigrana a reticello techniques. Italian, undated.
Wine glass in filigrana a reticello. Italy, c. 17thC
Glass ship hot work. 18thC Venice.
Mosaic of Doge Niccolo Marcello. This mosaic has a portrait of Niccolo Marcello, who was Doge (admiral) from 1473 to 1474, in the centre. Marcello Marcello’s portrait was repeatedly painted by Venetian painters such as Gentile Bellini and Titian in the 15th and 16th centuries. This mosaic was probably modeled on a portrait painted in a Venetian workshop.
Bottle in rock crystal with two handles, c.16th.
Cave a parfum. c.1870.
Glass rose water sprinkler, 18-19th C.
Insense burner with painting cicada and chrysanthemums, c.1840.
Bottle enameled with figures parading, c. 1500 AD.
Porcelain perfume bottle decorated with florid motif. C. 1760.
Black figure aryballos fragrant oil bottle, c.6thC.
Glass bottle with decoration, c.1C AD.
Toilet bottle, c.1stC AD.
Double head glass flask, c.1stC AD.
Porlain perfume bottle with enamels, c.1891-1920.
Glass perfume bottle “boy hon Fleur’s de Pommies”, c.1919.
Pair of glass perfume bottles in an enamel case, c.1770. This portable perfume set, which was popular at the court during the reign of King Louis XVI, is an extremely elegant case made of octagonal gold with beveled corners and decorated with a tortoiseshell pattern of scattered gold stars. It contains two glass perfume bottles with gold caps. The small gold funnel in the center is used to pour the blended perfume into the bottle. This piece was made as a special order for a French aristocrat.
Set of four glass perfume bottles with ornament case. Italy 19thC.
Mirror in glass mosaics, c.19thC.
Pommander, c.1630… is this made of glass??? I’m not seeing it.
Lamps in Millefiori glass, c.1910.
The Venetian Glass Rose Garden…
All the roses are made in glass… it’s really quite pretty and unfortunately very Insta-worthy. It took some patience to get some photos without the selfie crowd about!
’Le Tre Grazie’, c.1996 : Three bubbles inside the sphere emit rainbows when exposed to light – a eulogy to purity and feminine grace.
The gardens are really pretty and when the sun did peak out from behind the clouds, the sparkling in the glass forest was truly striking.
Onions and Reeds Installation, Dale Chihuly, c.1941.
Such a striking sculpture, and from the ‘40s – it’s hard to believe it’s as old as it is given the nature of the medium.
We also had a chance to go for a walk at the Hakone Open Air Museum. I am not super fond of modern art, but I think expected things to be a little less out of place than the Venetian glass!
“Girl with Rooster” – Shin Hongo (Japanese), 1962, bronze.
”Grandson of the General” – Seibo Kitamura (Japanese), 1918, bronze.
”Eva” – Francesco Messina (Italian), 1949, bronze.
”Pavillion Sculpture” – Max Bill (Swiss), 1969, white granite.
“Van Gogh Walking Through the Fields” – Ossip Zadkine (Russian/French), 1956, bronze. As I approached this piece, I saw the worn face and the heavy accoutrement and assumed it was going to be a heavily laden fighter with weaponry, it was only as I got closer I could see it wasn’t guns he was carry, and wasn’t until I saw the plaque that it was like, ‘Oh wow, did I read that wrong.’
”Great Prophet” – Pablo Gargallo (Spanish), 1933, bronze.
There is a world famous Picasso museum here, which is full of paintings, ceramics and even tapestries – most of which is created by Picasso himself, and some of which is inspired by the movement. To be honest, I’m not a huge fan. I can understand and appreciate the intent and important of most modern art; it’s just not that appealing to me, personally. Also – no photos. Sad panda face ensues.
Symphonic Sculpture (below) – Gabriel Loire is an 18-meter-tall tower covered entirely in stained glass made from shards of thick glass broken by hand with a hammer. “The intricate designs and patterns allow the outside light to pass through it in complex refracting motions, creating a beautiful, fantastical world.” Oddly, we have perfect weather for this – bright contrast outside makes photographing stained glass tricky.
It’s pretty spectacular… but no Saint Chapelle!!
”Two Piece Reclining Figure: Points” – Henry Moore (British), 1968-70, bronze.
”Family Group” – Henry Moore (British), 1948-49, bronze.
”Miss Black Power” – Niki de Saint Phalle (French), 1968, polyester resin, paint.
“Close III” – Anthony Gormley (British), 1993, iron. I LOVE this piece! It’s so simple and yet speaks to me. The artist’s statement, not so much, but the figure itself. ‘The artist recreated his body in iron. The rotatation and orbital revolution of the Earth produces centrifugal force and gravity binding it to the ground.’ Sure… but to me it speaks of years of exhaustion and chronic fatigue and pain.
”The Boxing Ones” – Barry Flanagan.
“Two Eggs” – ??? I have a note here somewhere…
”A Grand Story” – Giuliano Vango (Italian), 2004, Carrara marble.
“Intersecting Space Construction” – Ryoji Goto (Japanese), 1978. FRP, iron and paint – inspired by wire mesh and in praise of human connections.
I first came to Vienna and visited the Kunsthistoriches in 1995, and my most enduring memory of that visit was a truly flamboyant Austrian fellow in a brown suede jacket, showing us through the museum. He had a truly FABULOUS accent and was frequently referring to zee Emperah FRanzz JOseff and his wife, the Emprezs Merria TerrEEsia! I can still hear his voice nearly 30 years later. What I can say about that guide is that he set me on a path of analysing the visual. On that one visit, I went from admiring a picture because I thought it was pretty or appealing to looking for more meaning and symbolism – especially in medieval, religious and renaissance art. I wish I knew his name, he was a cool guy who brought he galleries to life.
I was quite keen to be here with 1) more time and 2) degrees in visual art and art history under my belt to see whether the same sorts of things resonated, or how differently I would perceive them seeing I have experienced so much more of the world since then.
I forgot how utterly stunning the building itself is. I remember it feeling like a rabbit warren, but had forgotten about the gorgeous vaulted spaces an magnificent staircases – I say, ‘staircases’, for there are several.
Built c. 1870-1890, it is one of the world’s most recognisable art museums – behind the Louvre and the MET perhaps. I think you could wander around and photograph just the building for half a day if you so choose. The dome is 200’ high and all the interiors are lavish with marble, stucco, gold leaf and murals.
We don’t build things like this anymore… I think it’s a shame.
Initial stop was a quick fly by through the cartoon galleries. These cartoons are not some of the most visited objects in the musuem, and as such seemed to be quite lacking in information. The
Hunters in the Snow – Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1565, Antwerp and Brussels. The group of hunters returns to the low-lying village, accompanied by an exhausted pack of dogs. Only a single fox hangs on one of the spears slung over the men’s shoulders. To the left preparations are afoot to singe a pig over an open fire. Delightful details such as skaters on frozen ponds have added to the picture’s enormous popularity. Yet it is not the sum total of details that make the picture important, rather its overall effect. In a manner both virtuosic and consistent, Bruegel evokes the impression of permanent cold in this first and most prominent winter landscape of European painting.
The Tower of Babel – Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, Antwerp and Brussels. Bruegel’s monumental composition became the most famous, most often copied and varied classic depiction of the tower. Perspective is provided by the seemingly Flemish port which seems tiny in comparison with the tower. Painstakingly, and in encyclopedic detail, Bruegel depicts countless technical and craftsmanship processes. He blends elements from antique and Romanesque architecture in the stone structure around the building’s exterior.
Massacre of the Innocents – Pieter Bruegel the Younger, c.1575, Antwerp and Brussels. The biblical subject of the infanticide ordered by Herod is relocated by Bruegel to a snowy Flemish village. The event is brought up to date to resemble a contemporary penal expedition due to the clothing, as the troops on horseback with their red tunics were a kind of police unit.
Peasant Wedding – Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c.1568, Brussels and Antwerp. The apparent “snapshot” of this picture is in fact carefully composed. Dispensing with allegorical meaning the painting is a realistic record of a Flemish peasants’ wedding. The bride sits in front of a green tapestry, a paper crown hangs over her. The bridegroom was not present at the wedding feast in accordance with Flemish custom. A lawyer with a mortar-board, a Franciscan monk and the lord of the manor with his dog (to the far right) are all visible; the porridge dishes carried in on an unhinged door are utterly simple, and the posture and gait of the carriers are similarly striking.
Peasant Dance, 1568 The opening dance of the country fair is depicted: a traditional leaping dance which was carried out by two pairs only and preceded the general dance. The pair in the foreground rushes to do this, but is distracted by the scene to the far left: a beggar (or is it a pilgrim?) approaches a table begging for alms. Bruegel’s view of peasants is neither condescending nor humorous – rather realism bordering on idealism dominates.
Children’s Games – Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1560, Brussels and Antwerp. From a bird’s eye perspective – this was the only way Bruegel could render visible the impressive crowd of figures – we look on to a cast square. Over 230 children are occupied with playing 83 different games. For those wishing to decipher all the games, the minuteness of the scenes necessitates slow and selective study – a pleasurable pastime indeed. Bruegel’s composition is without precedent or parallel in the fine arts and can be seen as a painted “encyclopaedia” – albeit without any moralising undertones.
The Fight Between Carnival and Lent – Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1559, Brussels and Antwerp. In the foreground of this encyclopaedia of Netherlands customs related to Carnival and Lent, Bruegel presents an allegorical jousting tournament as they actually occurred in the 15th and 16th centuries: on the left “Carnival” rides on a barrel, holding a roast on a spit as his weapon; on the right he is opposed by the skinny “Lent” extending a baker’s shovel with two fishes. The other details in this scene are also in keeping with the reality of the time as recorded in folklore. The depiction of everything happening in the same place at the same time, however, is Bruegel’s invention.
Jane Seymour, c.1536/37 – Hans Holbein, London.
Judith with the Head of Holofernes and a Servant, Lucas Cranach, c.1537, Vienna. The book of Judith in the Bible tells the story of how the young widow saved her hometown of Bethulia from being conquered by the Assyrians: Having won the affections of the enemy general Holofernes, Judith cut off his head with his sword as he slept drunk. Among the numerous depictions of this theme by Cranach, this painting is exceptional as it even shows the heroine’s servant.
Judith with the head of Holofernes – Lucas Cranach, c.1530, Vienna. With cunning and courage, the Old Testament heroine succeeded in entering the camp of Holofernes outside the city of Bethulia. There she put an end to the threat his troops posed by decapitating the enemy general. Cranach’s large workshop created all of the known half-length versions of Judith around the year 1530. Judith became the symbolic figure of Protestant resistance to the armies of Charles V.
Stag Hunt of Elector John Frederick – Lucas Cranach, 1544, Wittenberg. This depiction of a stag hunt is of the same type of courtly hunting picture created by Lucas Cranach the Elder. In the distance is the city of Torgau on the Elbe with Hartenfels Castle, which was finished in 1544. Prominent hunting guests can be seen in the foreground. In reality, however, they were never in or near Torgau: on the extreme left is Emperor Charles V, next to Elector Palatine Frederick, with Elector John Frederick of Saxony further to the front, under the tree in the middle of the paining is Duke Philip I of Brunswick.
Adam and Eve – Lucas Cranach the Elder, c.1510/20, Vienna, Wittenberg and Weimar. The first human couple is depicted monumentally on two separate panels, set against a black background. The spatial context is defined by the ‘Tree of Knowledge’. The serpent writhes around the branch on the right: we can see it has already performed its act of seduction, for Eve has bitten from the apple in her hand. Mary and jesus are depicted on the rear sides of the panels, meaning that they probably made up the wings of an altarpiece. Despite this religious context, Cranach exploits the biblical theme to display the full subtlety of his art of nude painting.
Emperor Maximilian I – Albrecht Dürer, c.1519, Nuremberg. The emperor is depicted here as an elegant private gentleman. The desired effect of dignity and power is achieved by the manner in which the emperor fills the frame and the brilliant execution of the fur collar. Several different interpretation have been suggested for the pomegranate in the emperor’s hand: as a private proxy for the imperial orb; as a reference to the myth of Persephone and thus a reference to death; and as an allusion to the conquest of Granada by the Christian armies in 1492.
Seeing this particular painting here back in 1995 spurred on my interest in art and art history… not long after that trip, I went back home and enrolled in a Bachelor of Fine Arts at Qld College of Art.
The Art of Painting – Johannes Vermeer, c.1666/68, Delft. With his depiction of the painter in his studio, Vermeer turns this genre painting into an allegory of the art of painting. His model is posing as Clio, the Muse of history, who inspires the painter and proclaims the glory of painting in the old Nether-lands, which she has immortalised in the book of history. The unity of the arts is reflected in the sculpture model, sketchbook and the work in progress on the easel. The map with the 17 provinces of the Netherlands before they were divided into north and south is a reference to a land that had always owed its fame to the art of painting.
The Cuckold Bridegroom – Jan Steen, c.1670 Jan Steen has opulently painted a genre scene with a morally instructive message. A somewhat older bridegroom is leading his reluctant and clearly heavily pregnant bride away from a party to their wedding night. The guests – including the artist, who has painted himself in the middle wearing a blue cape and playing a friction drum – are aware of the bride’s condition: on the right a young man is making the sign of the cuckold, holding up his hand with two spread fingers.
Angelica and the Hermit – Peter Paul Rubens, c.1625/28, Antwerp. One episode in Ariosto’s epic poem “Orlando furioso” (1516) describes how the heroine Angelica is pursued by a hermit who has fallen in love with her. Using his knowledge of magic, he casts a spell on her horse and takes her over the ocean to a remote island. Because she still rejects him, he makes her drink a sleeping potion so that he can kneel before her and admire her beauty.
The Feast of Venus – Peter Paul Rubens, c.1636/37, Antwerp/ A celebration of the omnipotence of love. It is based in part on a description in antiquity of a Greek painting in which a cult image of Aphrodite is decorated by nymphs, with winged cupids dancing around it. Rubens’s great role model, Titian, had been inspired by it in 1518 to create a painting that was later copied by Rubens. The open brushwork and differentiation in the coloration are a profession of admiration for Titian’s late works; the ecstatic intensity in this revival of antiquity is, however, Rubens’s highly personal.
Thank goodness the Kunsthistoriches has so many seating areas – it’s an enormous gallery.
The Holy Family Beneath an Apple Tree – Peter Paul Rubens, c.1630/32, Antwerp.
Infanta Isabella Clara Eugenia – Peter Paul Rubens, c.1620, Antwerp.
Self Portrait – Rembrandt, c.1638/40, Antwerp.
The Head of Medusa – Peter Paul Rubens, c.1617/18, Antwerp. This paining is quite a departure for Rubens usual style and is understood to be a political allegory symbolising the victory of Stoic reason over the enemies of virtue… deep!
Winter Landscape – Lucas von Valckenborch, c.1586, Antwerp, Linz and Frankfurt.
The snow is rendered in an impressionistic style that Bruegel apparently used first… photographing falling snow is difficult, so I imagine painting it is equally difficult.
Bow-Carving Amor – Josef Heintz, c.1603, Augsburg and Prague. I think this painting is fascinating – the named subject is almost the background or the architecture of the image, and the eye is immediately drawn to the impish or evil little ‘angel’ who is taking a cruel delight in restraining his companion and digging his nails into them. The actual Bow Carver looks serene and oblivious and is almost superfluous to the composition.
The Miracles of St Francis Xavier – Peter Paul Rubens, c.1617/18, Antwerp.
The Fish Market – Frans Snyders, c.1620/30, Antwerp. This image looks like two different styles, the sill life elements are rendered with exquisite detail, but the figures seem rough and undetailed in comparison – turns out Snyders did the still life fish market parts, but a colleague, Cornelis de Vos. Link to a large much image, the details are awesome: https://www.khm.at/en/objectdb/detail/1797/
The Hieronymus Altar – Jacob Cornelisz van Oostsanen, c.1511, Amsterdam. The centre picture shows St. Hieronymus as a cardinal with his attribute, the lion, from the paw of which he had pulled a thorn; in the fore-ground we see the kneeling benefactors of the altar; in the background scenes from legends about the saint. Saints are depicted on the wings, while on the outer side is shown High Mass as celebrated by Pope Gregory, to whom Christ appears.
Triptych: The Crucifixion – Roger van der Weyden, c.1440.
St. Johan Miniature Altar – Hans Memling, c.1486/90, Brugge.
Altarpiece of the Archangel Michael – Gerard David, c.1510, Antwerp. Michael triumphs over the powers of evil who appear here in the sinister realism of devilishly strange hybrid creatures. Seven in number, they remind us of the seven cardinal sins. In a small side-scene in the background the angels can be seen, led by Michael, struggling against the fallen angels of Satan, now turned into demons. On the inner wings are St. Hieronymus and St. Antony of Padua, on the outer wings St Sebastian and a female Saint with a boy.
Christ Carrying the Cross – Hieronymus Bosch, c.1450. Wood panel, painted on both sides. Bosch sets the scene in his present so as to make clear to the viewer the immorality of the world. The expression of evil is concentrated in the henchmen’s grimaces, which heralds a new psychological moment in the history of painting, The child with its toddler’s chair and pinwheel on the reverse of the panel has been variously interpreted, by some as the Infant Jesus, by others as an allegory of folly; particularly striking In any case is the contrast established between the child’s innocence and the wickedness in the Passion scene,
Lot and his Daughters – Lucas Cranach the Elder, c.1528, Vienna, Wittenberg and Weimar.
Infanta Margarita in a White Dress – Diego Velázquez, 1656, Seville and Madrid.
Allegory of Vanitas – Antonio de Pereda, c.1634, Madrid. A winged genius embodies “Vanitas”, the reminder of the transience of all things mortal. Objects are arrayed before him in Baroque profusion as if in a still life, which allude to time rapidly draining away, the futility of power and the fleeting nature of life’s joys. The table surface bears the inscription “nil omne” (all is trivial). It may be assumed from such references to the House of Habsburg as the small portrait of Charles V in the genius left hand that the picture was commissioned by the court.
Elisabeth of Valois, Queen of Spain – Alonso Sanchez Coello, c.1560, Madrid.
LEFT: Summer – Guiseppe Arcimboldo, 1563, Vienna Prague and Mailand. RIGHT: Fire – Guiseppe Arcimboldo, 1566, Vienna Prague and Mailand.
LEFT: Winter – Giuseppe Arcimboldo, 1563, Vienna Prague and Mailand. RIGHT: Water – Guiseppe Arcimboldo, 1566, Vienna Prague and Mailand.
Danae – Titian, c.1554, Venice. King Acrisius of Argos locked his daughter Danaë in a tower after an oracle told him she would bear a son who would someday kill him. But Jupiter fell in love with Danaë and came down in the form of golden rain to impregnate her. Their son, Perseus, would later kill his grandfather accidentally with a discus.
St Sebastian – Andrea Mantegna, c.1457/59, Pauda, Verona and Mantua. Chief bodyguard to Diocletian, Sebastian was sentenced to death for his Christian belief. Sebastian received wide-spread veneration, especially as a source of succour in times of plague. The plague that ravaged Padua in 1456/57 may in fact explain the tableau.
Madonna with Child and the Saints Catherine and Jacob the Elder – Lorenzo Lotto, c.1527/33, Venice.
The Madonna of the Meadow – Raphael, c.1505 or 1506, Florence and Rome.
Mary with the Child and the Saints Francis, Catherine and John – Raphael, c.1504, Bologna.
Saint Margret – Raphael, c.1518, Rome. Depicted here with sand worms from Dune!
Bathing Nymphs – Palma Vecchio, c.1525/28, Rome.
Snake, Upper Italian, c.1500-1550. Bronze.
Nautilus Cup, Augsburg, c.1624-1626. Nautilus shell, silver and partially gilded.
Cameos from the 11th to the 14th Centuries.
Aquamanile in the Form of a Griffon, Helmarshausen, c.1120-1130. Gilded bronze, demascened silver, niello and garnet.
Pope Gregory with Scribe, Lorraine, late 10thC, Ivory.
Incense boat, Venice, 15thC, amethyst, gilded silver, traces of enamel.
Klappaltärchen – Small Folding Altarpiece, Northern French, c.1375-1400, gilded silver and enamel.
The Klappaltächen is approximately 6cm x 12cm.
Crosier with the Coronation of the Virign, Venice, late 14thC. Gilded and painted bone.
Two Lidded Beakers, Burgundian-Netherlandish, c.1420/30. Partially gilded silver, enamel, metal foils.
Lidded Cup of imperor Frederick II Burgundian-Netherlandish, C.1473
Partially gilded silver, rock crystal, enamel, metal foils
The arms and inscriptions on this lidded beaker refer to Emperor Frederick III.
Angels present his so called motto, with the metal foils that have them offering one of its many suggest interpretations:
“aquila eíus fuste omnia vincet” – “His eagle will rightly triumph over everything*.
The emperor is said to have received the beaker in 1473 as a gift from Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy.
Medallion with the Nativity and the Epiphany, Lombard, c.1470/80, Silver and enamel.
Virgin and Child, Southern Germany, c.1500 Partially gilded silver.
Chalice, Lower Saxony, c.1475, gilded silver.
Chalice featuring the Arms of the Counts of Hoya, Lower Saxony, 1498, gilded silver.
Rosary Pendant with the Passion of Christ, a so-called Prayer nut, Netherlandish, early 16thC, Boxwood.
Bowl, Venice, late 15thC/early 16thC, copper and enamel.
Bowl with Biblical and Mythological Scenes, Venice, c.1450-1500. Glass with enamel painting.
Billy Goat called Riccio, Padua, c. 1575-1625s. Bronze.
Drinking Satyr – Andrea Briosco, c.1515/20, Padua, bronze.
Sandshaker in the form of a Toad, Padua, c.1500-1525, bronze.
Seated Pan – Pier Jocopo Alari de Bonacoisi, Mantua, c.1519, Bronze.
Boy Strangling Goose – Andrea Briosco, called Riccio (1470 – 1532), Padua, c.1515/20, Bronze Although the Greek original of the “Boy Strangling a Goose” is now lost, a number of Roman marble copies and Pliny’s description of it have survived. Briosco was interested in the genre-like motif of this famous sculpture, its lifelikeness and the several views it offers to the onlooker. His virtuoso miniature version is a deliberate attempt to rival the classical masters. This bronze piece is about 35cm high and has incredible movement in it.
Backgammon Board and Gaming Pieces, c.1537. Oak, nut wood, rosewood, palisade r, mahogany and bronze.
The Portrait of the Ruler as a Propaganda Medium During their lifetime various types of portraits in different media depicting the imperial brothers Charles V and Ferdinand / were disseminated throughout Europe. A portrait popularised the sovereign’s features, served as a reminder of him and even represented him when he was absent. The emphasis on family connections with predecessors and/or descendants signalled the continuity of the dynasty’s power.
Medallion with a Portrait of Emperor Charles V, Netherlandish, Mechelen, c1520, gold and enamel.
Portrait of Kaiser Karl V, Southern Germany, after 1520, Limestone.
Winged Altarpiece – workshop of Heinrich Fûllmaurer. German, c.1540. Oil on spruce. This altarpieces has more pictures in it that’s any other contemporary German artwork – it was commissioned for the Protestant church at Montbeliard before the Reformation categorically banned all images from churches.
Cupids Playing – Daniel Mauch (1477-1540), Ulm, c.1520/30, Partially painted pear wood. Playing cupids were a popular motif in early Italian Renaissance sculpture; here, the artist repeats it but adds a special interpretation. The fragmentary inscription on the base tells us that this – only ostensibly harmless – game of three winged children should be read as a reflection of the erotic passions of adults.
Tapestry with the Arms of Emperor Charles V – William de Pannmaker (c.1535-1581). Brussels, c.1540. Wool, silk, gold and silver thread.
Scenes from the Book of Tobias : Tobias introducing his traveling companion to his father. Brussels, c.1540. Wool and silk.
Cabinet – Giovanni Batista Panzeri (c1520-1591), Milan, c.1567-76. Wood gilded iron, damascene gold and silver, bronze.
Cittern Player Automaton, Spanish, c.1500-1600. Painted wood, iron, linen and silk brocade. A mechanism inside this figure of a girl makes her playt he cittern, turnher head and trip along the table. In the 16thC, such androids were prized for their ability to imitate Nature. Such works were a speciality of Juanelo Torriano, celebrated clockmaker to Emperor Charles V.
The Triumph of Death over Chastity, French, early 16thC. Wool and silk. One of a six part series depicting the poem of Triumphs of Petrarch (1304-1374).
Adoration of the Virgin and the Mystic Marriage of Saint Catherine – Master of Helligerkreuz. French, c.1410/20, tempera on wood, partially gilded.
Game Board for Chess and Backgammon with Twenty Playing Pieces, Venice, c.1300-1350 (some later alterations). Wood with certosina inlay, Japan, bone, agate, chalcedony, painted clay reliefs and miniatures under rock crystal. In the Middle Ages the game of ches was considered one of the knightly arts. This boards’s numbers figures are based on motifs of the knightly/courtly world and refer to hunting, music, courtly love and the fight against monsters. Very few game boards from the medieval period have been preserved. This one was first documenting the Ambara collection of Archduke Ferdinand II in 1596.
Hexagonal Casket, Embriachi Workshop, Venice, c.1375-1425. Wood with certosina inlay, bone, traces of paint and gilding.
Christ as Judge of the World, Netherlandish or Maaslandish, early 15thC, painted wood.
Ornamental Onyx Ewer – Richard Tourain the Younger (master 1558-1519), Paris 1570. Sardonyx, agate, gold, enamel, rubies, diamonds, emerald, pearl.
Limousine Painted Enamel. In the 16th Century, the French city of Limoges was a European centre for the production of painted enamel tableware. These plates depict the months of the year, modelled on engraves by Etienne Delaunay, they are decorated in grisaille that was in fashion at the French court. The plaster and bowls were never actually used but served purposes of princely ostentation.
Lidded cup with Diana and her companions – Pierre Raymond, Limoges, c.1554. Copper and enamel.
The Cellini Salt Cellar! Working in Rome in 1540, Benvenute Cellini made a wax model for a salt container, a ‘Saliera’, for his patron Ippolito d’Este. He designed a goldsmith’s work so extraordinarily complex that the cardinal decided that only the King of France could commission such a work*. Soon after, Cellini entered the service of the French King, Francis I (1494-1547), who actually commissioned him to carry it out. (*that’s one way to say ‘Dude.. that’s beyond my budget!’)
While working in France, Cellini met other Italian artist who the King had appointed to work on the redesign of his palace in Fontainebleau near Paris – painters such as Rosso Florentino and Francesco Primaticcio Brough formal idea of the Italian Renaissance to France. The style of the “School of Fontainebleau” developed there is considered a French variant on the Mannerism art movement.
The French Kings promoted art and science, partly in competition with the House of Habsburg who were their fiercest opponent in the fight for supremacy in Europe. Francis I collected works by the most famous painters such as Raphael, Titian, Leonardo da Vinci. They also commissioned and purchased tapestries, vessels, cameos goldsmiths’ works and other precious objects. Their artistic quality, refinement and elegance were characteristic of the high culture at the court of the French Kings.
Shell shaped bowl, French, c.1560. Lapis lazuli, gold and enamel.
Pendant with Miniature Portraits of King Charles IX and his mother, Catherine de Medici. François DuJardin (goldsmith, 1543-1587) and François Clouet (painter, 1510-1572). Gold, enamels and miniature painting.
Bowl in the Form of a Ship, Paris, c.1630. Lapis lazuli, gold, enamel, pearl.
Sewing Box – Elia Lencker (master 1562-1597), Nuremberg, c.1577/89. Gilded and painted silver, wood, gemstones and velvet. The top of the little box is covered with a cushion that served as a support for lacemaking. The relives on the outside depicts female figures from teh Old Testament: the Queen of Sheba, Rebecca and Abigail – their virtues clearly designed to serve as an inspiration for the box’s nobles owner. Inside features a number of drawers and compartments.
Lidded Cup, Spanish or Antwerp (?), c.1560. Rhinoceros horn, gold and enamel.
Stationary Horizontal Sundial – Christoph I Schißler, Southern German, c.1564. Gilded copper alloy
Horizontal Sundial in the Shape of a Lute, Southern Germany, c.1550-1600. Copper alloy, gold plated, ivory, glass and silver.
Ever with Handle in the Form of a Serpent, Freiburg im Bresigau or Munich, late 16thC. Rock crystal, gold enamel, emeralds, rubies, pearls.
Pendant Capsule with a Portrait of Duchess Anna of Bavaria – Munich Court Workshop, c.1579/1590. Gold, deep cut enamel, miniature painting.
Pendant with Whistle, Ear Spoon and Toothpick in base – Allegory of Bravery, Augsburg, c.1570/80. Gold, enamel, pearls, rubies, diamonds.
Casket, Nuremberg, c.1560-70. Wood, gilded copper, mother of pearl reverse-side glass painting. The rich decoration of the casket is dominated by reverse side glass painting in lacquer paints with gold foil and depicts the months of the year, the Muses and the Virtues after engravings by the Nuremberg draughtsmen and engraver, Virgil Solis.
Double Cup – Part of a ten piece set, Fredrich Hildebrand, Nuremberg c.1593-1600 Silver, gold-plated, mother of pearl, emeralds, rubies. In 1600, Duke Wilhelm V of Bavaria gave this ensemble to his daughter Maria Anna for her wedding to her cousin, the future Emperor Ferdinand II. It testifies to the close family ties between the houses of Wittelsbach and Habsburg, as well as the great importance of gifts for the holdings of princely art chambers. The mother-of-pearl decoration cites Indian models.
Automaton in the Form of a Ship – Hans Schlottheim (c.1544-1625), Augsburg, c. 1585. Gilded and partially painted silver, copper alloy, iron. Centrepieces in the shape of a ship have a long tradition; the decorative figures and coats of arms glorify the ruler and his empire. A complex mechanism propels the ship across the table while the crew moves to music from inside the ship. As a nightly the cannon also fire a salvo.
Mechanical Celestial Globe Georg Roll (1546-1592) Augsburg, c. 1584.
Gilded and partially pained copper alloy, silver, enamel, wood and iron.
Cruciform Pendant Watch – Konrad Kreisler, Augsburg, c.1600. Gold, enamel, rock crystal, gilded copper alloy and iron.
Lidded Prase Vessel on a High Foot- Octavio Miseroni (1567-1624), Prague, c.1600. Prase, heliotrope, gold, enamel, garnets, citrine, amethyst, hyacinth.
Book cover – Jan Vermeyen (1559-1608), Prague, c.1600-1605. Heliotrope, gold enamel and garnets.
Stacking Box, Munich, 1586. Lathe work: Giovanni Ambrogio Maggiore (c1550-1617). Painting: Georg Hoefnagel (1542-1600). Ivory, body colours.
‘I Trionfi’ Ornamental Basin and Ewer set – Christoph Lamnitzer (1563-1618), Nuremberg, 1601/02. Gilded silver and enamel.
The conventional ewer and basin set that was used at the courtly table for the washing of hands, transformed into a showpiece glorifying the emperor. The rich and complex decoration is inspired by the allegorical poem ‘I Trionfi’ (Triumphs) by Petrarch. Eternity, which crowns the ewer, triumphs over Love, Chastity, Death, Fame and Time.
Mercury – Johann Gregor van der Schardt (1530-1581), Nuremberg, c.1570/1578. Bronze.
Double-headed Eagle with the Coat of Arms of Bohemia – Giovanni Castrucci, Prague c. 1610. Image made of gold and cut garnet, lapis lazuli, cornelian, agate, chalcedony, jasper.
The Annunciation and the Adoration of the Shepherds – Paolo Piazza (1557-1621), Prague, 1602. Painted Alabaster. In the 16thC, Italian painters in particular experimented with various types of stone for cabinet and devotional pictures. Inspired by the stones’ natural colouration and pattern, they incorporated them into their designs. This type of painting flourished at the court of Emperor Rudolph II.
Shell shaped Cup – Hans Kobenhaupt (d.1623), Agate, gilded silver and enamel.
Cup with handles, Southern Germany, c.1675-1700. Amethyst, gold, enamel and garnets.
Lidded Tankard – Andreas Osenbruck of the Miseroni Workshop, Prague, c.1612-19. Jasper, gold, enamel, garnets.
Lidded cup Nikolaus Pfaff (c.1556-1612) Prague, 1611.
Rhinoceros Horn, warthog tusks, gilded, and partially painted silver.
This ornate cup from the Kunstkammer of Emperor Rudolph II has a lid that encases a warthog’s jaw, the tusks of which for the horns of a monstrous face. Together with the small animals, this will have stood for the demonic side of nature, which the healing powers of the rhinoceros horns vessel, seemingly beset with branded coral, were believed to banish.
Drinking Horn in the form of a Dragon Cornelius Gross (1534-1575). Augsburg, c. 1560.
Tortoise shell, gilded silver, enamel and remains of paint.
A tortoise shell Horne, asn an exotic rarity was adapted into a bizarre drinking vessel by an Augsburg goldsmith. The winged dragon stands atop a tortoise and turns its neck aggressively towards the viewer. A small satyr on its back bears the arms of an Earl of Montfort-Tettnang, from whose estate the objected entered the collection of Archduke Ferdinand II of Tyrol.
The Mercury Beaker, Antwerp, c. 1560. Gold, enamel, emeralds, rubies.
Bear as Hunter – Gregor Bair (master 1573-1604), Augsburg and Munich, c.1580/81. The Bear Hunter is amongst the most popular motifs of the ‘world turned upside-down’ where the quarry becomes the hunter. A drinking cup is unexpectedly hidden in the removable heard, a miniature game board is found in the base and due to a coating, the object smells of ambergris. Hunt, game and drink illustrates forms of courtly amusement. Silver, gold, brass, enamel, irone, ambergris, jewels.
Game Board and Pieces for Draughts and Backgammon – Hans Repfl (c.1550-1600), Innsbruck, c.1575. This game board and its pieces, richly decorated with wooden intarsia and zinc inlay represent Archduke Ferdinand II as sovereign of tyro and Further Austria as a member of the house of Habsburg. The dynastic-genealogical and political program is linked with cosmological aspects represented by reliefs of gods.
Automaton Clock with a Parrot, Southern German, c.1580/90. Bronze, gilded copper, silver enamel, iron and brass.
Clock with Wooden Case – Hans Kiening (c.1505-1586), Füssen im Aligäu, c.1577/78. Wood, painted paper, gilded brass, tin, iron.
Trumpeter Automaton – Hans Schlottheim (1544-1625), Augsburg, 1582. Ebony, palisades, gilded silver, enamel, gilded brass, iron. An ingenious clockwork for the musical mechanism and the movements of the drummers and trumpeters is concealed in the tower.
Coin Cabinet of Archduke Ferdinand II, Augsburg, c. 1580.
Ebony, Ivory, gilded bronze, rock crystal, pearls, glass.
Horoscope Amulet of Wallenstein.
Southern German, c.1600-1610. Rock crystal, gold, gilded silver.
Smelling Salts Bottle in the Form of a Fish, Spanish, 17thC. Gold, enamel and diamonds.
Ornate jug with Cameo Decorations, Flemish Antwerp, c. 1620. Cameos from 14thC to 17thC. Onyx, chalcedony, carnelian, coral; Commesso; Setting: silver, gold-plated, gold, enamel, rubies, diamonds, emeralds, turquoise.
Several cabinets in the imperial treasury of the 17th century were filled with vessels made of precious materials. The position and importance of the House of Habsburg were particularly clearly demonstrated by these showpieces – some of which were commissioned, some of which were gifts. The multi-part setting with cameos, pearls and precious stones as well as the newly established enamel painting determine the rich appearance of many of these works.
Lidded Tankard, Prague, c. 1620/30. Jasper, gold, enamel, rubies.
Phoenix – Master of Furies, c.1600-1625, Salzburg, Ivory. The figure of a bird interpreted as a phoenix demonstrates the play between nature and art typical of princely art and treasuries.The master transformed the smooth elephant tusk into tousled plumage, contrasting the conventional emphasis on the silken, lustrous surface of ivory with the virtuosic differentiation of textures throughout… this thing is FUCKING COOL! I love it.
Table Clock, So-called Mirror Clock. Monogrammist IH, Augsburg or Frankfurt, c. 1670.
Partially gilded silver, gemstones, rubies an enamel.
Precious Natural Matieral in Early Baroque Art – Amber Vessel, c. 1620-1660.
Automaton in the Form of a Galley, Stuttgart, c.1626. Ivory, brass, line, silk, iron. Design: Georg Burrer (d.1627). Carving: Georg Ernst (d.1634), Mechanism: Christoph Schorkfel (1626).
The belly of this warship contains a movement that makes the galley roll over the table and the chained prisoners row. The ship and its crew, carefully executed down to the finest details, was made in Stuttgart by two ivory turners and a clockmaker, whose names are conveyed by a contemporary slip of parchment inside the galley.
Description was missing… we have noticed in some of the side galleries there are so many objects crammed into display cabinets and there are no descriptions on them at all! This collection is so enormous – any single one of these items would get a room to itself and a full wall of explanation if it were in a museum in the southern hemisphere!
Ulrich Baumgartner Cabinet.
Ebony, agate, turquoise, jasper, copper, enamel, bronze, ivory, mother of pearl, coral and shells.
Cabinet: Augsburg, c. 1631-34.
Stand later addition : Georg Haupt (1741-1784), Stockholm, 1776.
Collection of 16thC earrings, with no further descriptions:
Again, no description – but thes were such a beautiful objects. Flowers carved from solid stone, in vases made from solid stone with silver filigree handles set with garnets. Gorgeous.
Calculator – Anton Braun (1686- 1728), Vienna, 1727. Gided and partially tinned brass. The clockmaker, optician and mechanic to the Viennese court, Anton Braun, created this pinwheel machine for the mechanised computation of various basic arithmetical operations and dedicated it to Emperor Charles VI. The device was primarily conceived for land surveying calculations.
Late Roman Rings, 3rd-4th C, from Cibolae (Vincovel, Croatia). Gold.
Jupiter Dolichenus, Bronze, solid cast, bull partly hollow, pedestal made of bronze sheet. The god stands on the back of a bull, dressed in a Phrygian cap, long sleeved undergarment, muscle armour, cloak and half boots. In his right hand he holds the double axe (only the handle remains). In his left a lightning bolt. The inaction names the veteran Marius Ursinus as the donor… all that and no date?
Gold treasure of Nagyszentmiklos, Early Middle Ages, 7th-9th Centuries AD. Found in 1799, Nagyszentmiklos (now Sannicolau Mare, Romania).
Maximianus I, Herculeus. 293/294 AD. Gold, inlays of garnet.
Gold bracteate pendant. Gold inlaid with garnet.
Jewellery form the Early Migration Period. 400-450C AD. Gold, partly with garnet inlays Neck ring, bent into a horse bridle. From Kronstadt (Brasov, Romania)
Finger rings, Byzantine of Byzantine styles. 6-7thC AD. Gold.
Golden Brooches. Two roll brooch. Three button brooch. Gold brooch.
Gold Basket Earrings. From Ceneda Italy, c.6-7thC.
Gold Jewellery: Gold with garnet inlays. Pair of Earrings. Necklace with pendants. Necklace. Pair of bracelets with animal heads. Finger rings. Plates with gold glass inlay.
Brooch with Inscription: “VTERE FELIX” – “USE IT WITH LUCK” Roman, end of 3rdC AD. Gold, openwork technique, filigree and granulation decoration
Treasure found by Stiagysomiyo, East Germanic, deposited c.550AD. Found in 1797 in Sailegysmolyo (today Simlue Silvaniei, Romania) Body Chain with 52 Pendants. Gold, smokey quartz.
Onyx Fibula. Roman, 3rdC AD. From the grave find at Osziropataka (today Ostrovany, Eastern Slovakia). Gold, open work technique, onyx.
Century Brooch, Roman late antiquity. C.460AD. Found in Rebreny (near Nagymihaly, today Michalow). Gold, onyx, garnet, amethyst, glass paste.
Belt Buckle with Cell Inlay, c. 500-550AD. Bronze, inlays: glass and pearl.
NECKLACE WITH PENDANTS – Silver Treasure from Zalesie, Byzantine-provincial. Late 6th – 7th century AD. Found in 1838 in Zalesie (Ukraine). Silver, decorated with filigree and granulation, partially gold-plated. Inlays: glass.
Grave Find from Assmeritz, Germanic, c.400AD. Found in 1818 near Assmeritz (today Nasoburky, Czech Replubic.
Grave find from Alt-Ofen (Budapest, Hungary), c.460AD. Pair of polyhedron earrings. Gold earrings with garnet inlays.
Temple Jewellery Eagle Heads, Small Bells. Based on a Byzantine model, 100-750AD. From Rackeve (Hungary). Gold, blue glass inlay.
BELT COMPONENTS: Bronze; partly white metal coating. Decorative disc, from Worms (Germany) Belt buckle, from Dunapentele (Hungary) Belt buckles, counter plate, From Reims (France)
Gemma Augustea, Roman, 9 – 12 AD Two-layered sardonyx, setting: gold ring, back in ornamented openwork
In the upper strip of the picture, Augustus is enthroned in the costume and pose of Jupiter, holding a scepter and augur’s staff. To his right sits Roma, the patroness of the city. Between the heads of the two figures is Capricorn, the star of Augustus’s birth, and at his feet is the eagle. On the right side is a group of allegorical figures: Oikumene, the inhabited earth (she holds a wreath of oak leaves over the emperor’s head), Okeanos: the personification of the sea, and Italia with a cornucopia and two boys. Next to Roma stands Augustus’ great-nephew, Germanicus, in officer’s uniform. On the left, Tiberius, the emperor’s stepson and designated successor, climbs down from a chariot of two horses driven by Victoria; he is crowned with laurel and holds a long sceptre.
In the lower strip of the picture, gods (3) erect a tropaion (victory monument) and lead captured barbarians towards them. The depiction may refer to the suppression of the Dalmatian uprising: on January 16, 10 AD, the commander-in-chief of the Roman troops, Tiberius, entered Rome; here he appears before the emperor as the victor.
Negau Helmet with Harigastin Inscription, Italian-Slovenian type, c.450-500BC. From the Zenjak-Negau (Slovenia) Hoard, cast and re-embossed bronze.
The bronze helmet, decorated with rows of punched ornaments, is one of the oldest Negau helmets from the Zenjak-Negau hoard. It owes its fame to the inscription that was carved into the brim in a North Italian, probably Venetian or Rhaetian, alphabet.
The owner’s inscription “harigastiteiva” written from right to left mentions the presumably Gaermanic name, Harigast and is therefore one of the oldest known Germanic language monuments. “Teiva” is probably to be interpreted as his second name. The end of the text is marked by three slashes followed by two filler characters. The character sequences “IIXIIX” are engraved in two other places on the brim, though their meaning is unclear – they could be numerals of ownership or manufacturers marks.
Stamnos With Underworld Scene, Faliscan red-figure, c.325-300BC, Clay. The deceased is depicted in the centre, she sits on her cloak and plays the layer. In front of her a female demon of death raise one of its snake-entwined arms threatening, while Charun rushes towards her from behind a dragon-like snake. The Etruscan demon of the underworld whose name comes from the Unified Man of the Dead, Charon. The twisted handles end in a sea monster on each side.
Achilles and Penthesileia Volute Krater Apulian red-figure, 2nd quarter of the 4th century BC, Clay. Reading vases is a particular skill – one which I have never acquired, so I was thankful for the placards: This krater was created in one of the leading Apulian workshops in Taranto in the second quarter of the 4th century BC and is attributed to the Ilioupersis Painter. Scene belongs is the battle for Troy: the death of Queen Penthesileia in the arms of Achilles. After the death of Hector, the Amazons came to the aid of the Trojans. Penthesileia is fatally wounded by Achilles, but they fall in love. The Amazon queen has fallen from her horse, Achilles is holding the collapsing queen. On the left is a mounted Amazon with the queen’s horse rearing up. Above is the goddess Nike and the love god Eros, with wreaths in their hands. On the back, the god Dionysus sits in a circle of two maenads and a satyr.
Amphora with Volute Handles, Malacena Genus, 3rdC BC.
Clay Urns from Chiusi, painted on white ground, 2nd C BC – Hero with Ploughshare Lid, Lying Woman. The Etruscan inscription pained on the farm reads: Baninei : spectunic” and names the deceased: Larthia from the family Thansina Spetu.
LEFT: Warrior Eye Cup, c.525 BC CENTRE: Duel Fight Belly Amphora With Lid, c.550 BC RIGHT: Dionyious Satry and Manaden Amphora, c.525 BC
LEFT: Athena Pseudo-Danathen Amphora, c.525 BC CENTRE: Kyathos Teamwork, c.500 BC RIGHT: Xenocles Pottery Inscription Rim Bowl, c.500BC
LEFT: Left food with Sandal-Figuratory Vessel, c.500 BC CENTRE-LEFT: Oinochoe in the Form of a Female Head, c.470 BC CENTRE: Oidipus and the Sphinx White Based Lekythos, c.500 BC CENTRE-RIGHT: Lion and partner White-ground lekythos, c.490 BC RIGHT: Riding Amazon and Warrior White-ground Oinochoe, c.480 BC
Mythological Due Fligths and Soul Weighing Lebes (Mixing Vessel), Aryan black-figure, 540 – 530 BC. From Caere (Cervetert, Italy).
Lion Hunting Sarcophagus, Roman, c.270-290 AD. The owner of the tomb is depicted hunting wild animals on horseback with his companions and servants. To his left stands Virtus with a helmet on his head; embodying the bravery and virtue of the deceased. As lion hunting was a privilege of princes and kings this subject infers high social rank of the deceased. Lions also symbolise victory and stood as a grave guard to ward off evil and a symbol. Sarcophagi like this one were made in advance with the main figures facial features to be added for the tomb’s eventual owner.
Bottle from Pinguente, Gallo-Roman, 2ndC AD. From Pinguente (Bizet, Croatia).
Gold Necklace, 2nd C AD. The fashion of using coins as jewellery became widespread in the later Roman Imperial period from the end of the 2nd C AD, gold coins set in wide settings were worn as pendants on necklaces. This became a particularly popular art form in Egypt. Necklace consists of four braided chains – adjustable length using two ball sleeves. Four gold coins with Faustian the Elder (died 141 AD), her husband Emperor Antoninus Pius (138-161), as well as the Emperors Marcus Aurelius (161-180) and Gordian III (238-244).
Relief Crater, Roman, c. 100 BC.
Grimani Relief Liwin with Young, Roman, 50-100 AD.
Grave Relief of Dionysius and Melitine, Eastern Greek, 200-150 BC.
Theseus and Ariadne Mosaic, Roman 2ndC BC. Left: Ariadne hands Theseus the ball of wool. Middle: Theseus defeats the Minotaur. Above: Theseus and Ariadne board the ship. Right: The abandoned Ariadne on Naxos. The surrounding pattern represents the Labyrinth.
Four-headed Sphinx, Roman, 250-300 AD.
Barricade from a New Year’s Pavilion. Late Period 26th Dynasty, reigns of Psammetichus I and II, 664-589 BC.
Sarcophagus of the priest Pa-nehem-isis, Ptolemaic Period, 2nd C BC from Samaria Greywacke. There is hardly any undecorated surface on this sarcophagus – the tests and representations (gods of the hereafter worship of the sun, the mummy on a bier etc). Most of the texts deal with the sun’s nocturnal journey through the underworld.
Statue group of the god Horus and King, Haremha, New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty, reign of Haremhab, C.1343 – 1315 BC, Limestone. The king wears the nemes-headcloth with uraeus-serpent and the Double Crown of Upper and Lower Egypt. Horus is depicted with a man’s body but the head of a falcon. As early as the Early Dynastic Period, Horus was worshipped as a sun god and god of the heavens; like the king, he wears a pleated kilt and the Double Crown.
Upper part from a statue of Thutmose III, New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty, Reign of Thutmost III, 1504-1452 BC. Despite the absence of an inscription naming the king depicte in this smiling idealised likeness, he can be identified by its similarly to other securely dates sculptures of him. Here he wears the names, the traditional royal striped head cloth, with a rearing serpent at his brown and king’s wavy false beard.
Stele of Nes-imen, Late Period, 1st half of the 26th Dynasty, c.600-650 BC, Perhaps from Abydos Painted limestone. An offering scene is depicted below the gable of this stele. Nes-omen, an ointment cone on his head, presents offering pile high on a table to the golds Isis and Osiris. In addition to the standard request for offerings for himself, Nes-imens 6 line text includes his genealogy going back three generations.
Decorative Collar – Old Kingdom, end of the 5th to the beginning of the 6th Dynasty, ca. 2450-2350 BC. From Giza, western cemetery. Decorative collar: Faience, gold foil.
Statuette of a hippopotamus, Middle Kingdom, 11th- 12th Dynasty, ca. 2000 BC. Presumably from Thebes. Faience, greenish-blue glaze, painted. Statuettes depicting hippopotami, symbolic of a beloved Grabbeigabe, regeneration in the hereafter, were popular grave goods that were placed close to mummies.
LEFT: Coffin of Hor, Ptolemaic period, around 3rd century BC, Wood; stucco, painted, gilded. RIGHT: Coffin of Ptah-irdis, Ptolemaic period, around 3rd century BC, Probably made of el-Hiba wood; stucco, painted.
Left: chest with bird figure Ptolemaic period, around 3rd-2nd century BC Wood; stucco, painted Acquired before 1824
Ptah-Sokar-Osiris- Statuette Ptolemaic period, around 3rd-2nd century BC Wood; Stucco, painted Old inventory
Ptah-Sokar-Osiris statuette Ptolemaic to Roman period, c. 2nd – 1stC BC Wood; stucco, painted
Lid of the sarcophagus of Chedeb-neith-iret-binet. Late Period, 25h Dynasty, ca. 600 BC
Coffins from the 2nd cachette in Deir el-Bahari In 1891 the Egyptian antiquities administration undertook excavations at the Temple of Hathepsut in Deir el-Bahari. On the edge of the temple precinct, a shaft was discovered which turned out to contain a great many burials (known as cachette – complete with coffins, mummies, and funerary equipment), which had been hidden from tomb robbers in antiquity. A few years earlier a cachette of royal burials had also come to light at Thebes. The 2nd cachette included 153 burials of priests. Because the finds were so numerous, the Egyptian government made gifts of them to museums worldwide. Along with some other items, the coffin ensembles of Nes-pauti-taui and Ta-baket-nit-chensu each comprising inner and outer coffins with mummy boards – came to the Kunsthistorisches in Vienna.
Interesting… so I’d been walking through the Egyptian galleries thinking ‘they gotta give this shit back’ and Egypt has (had?) so much of it they were deliberately sending it away?!
Western Thebes, Deir el-Bahari, 2nd cachette. Wood; cartonage, painted; varnish 1893, gift of the Egyptian government.
The inner coffin of the priestess Ta-baktet-nit-chensu is of the set that also included an outer coffin (1). The Goddess of the West is depicted inside, on the floor of the basin.
The yellowish-orange colour of the background for the figures is characteristic of coffins during this period. Also typical is the varnish that dims the colours.
The Kaiserliche Schatzkammer or the Imperial Treasury of Vienna! Where we are hoping to see all the things that we have seen copies of so far! lol For people into medieval embroidery or early medieval gold work, this place really is a treasure trove. I was super excited to be here, before we even entered the building.
Tabard of the Herald of the Princely County of Tyrol -Johann Fritz (embroider) Vienna, 1838, Silver lamé, velvet, gold, silver and silk embroidery, silver fringing braid.
From the Left: 1) Staff of the Grand Controllers – Southern German, 1600-1610. 2) Staff of the Grand Steward of the County of Gorlzia – Southern German, c.1660. 3) Staff of the Hungarian Grand Equerry – Vienna, 1700-1725. 4) Staff of the Grand Comptroller – Vienna, 1835. 5) Cane of the Grand Equerry – Vienna, 1790-1800. 6) Staff of a Master of Ceremonies – Vienna, 1800-1850. 7) Staff of a Junior Master of the Table – Vienna, 1800-1810. Staff of the Grand Master of the Table – Vienna, 1835. 8) Staff of a Master of Ceremonies – Vienna, 1800-1835. 9) Staff of a Grand Master of Ceremonies – Vienna, 1850-1900…. Wood or cane, bronze, gilded, and silver mounts.
The Hereditary Banner of Austria. Austria, c.1705. Silk, damask, embroidered with metal and silk threads.
Keys of the Imperial Chamberlain, from 1711 to 1918. As a sign of their privileged status chamberlains at the Habsburg court wore a key that symbolized their access to the ruler’s chambers. The office of chamberlain was reserved to members of the high nobility. The holders of this office belonged to the “first society” and were part of the emperor’s retinue at official ceremonies. The falconer’s gear as well as the tabards and staffs on view here are similarly the insignia of various officials or families in the hereditary lands and indicate their rank and status.
Dog Collar, Insignia of the Grand Master of the Hunt, Vienna, 1838. Velvet, leather gold embroidery. Mounts silver mounted.
Austrian Archducal Coronet of Joseph II, c.1764. Silver glided, diamonds, semi-precious stones removed. As early as the reign of Duke Rudolf IV (1339-65) the Habsburgs pursued the goal of being raised to the dignity of archduke. Their claim was finally recognized in 1453, and the archducal coronet, an insignia resembling a crown became the official symbol of Habsburg rule in the hereditary lands. Such an insignia was created for Archduke Joseph in 1764 based on medieval models. The coronet’s gold foil frame, or “carcass”, is exhibited in this room. The jewels were soon removed from the coronet to be used for other purposes.
Insignia for the Hereditary Grand Master Falconer, Vienna, 1835. Leather, velvet, gold braid, gold embroidery and feathers. Falconers pouch and two falcon’s hoods.
Tabard for the Herald of the Roman King, Vienna, 1600-1650; gold lamé, satin, gold embroidery, finger border, glass beading.
Tabard for the Herald of the Roman Emperor, Vienna, 1613 and 1719. Gold lamé, silk and glass.
Tabard for the Herald of Emperor Francis I Stephen, Vienna, 1775-1750. Velvet, satin, gold and silver lamé, gold silver and silk embroidery, gold and fringe border.
Tabard for the Herald of the King of Bohemia, Vienna, 1600-1700. Velvet, gold and silver embroidery, fringing braid, glass beading.
Tabard for the Herald of the King of Hungary, Vienna, 1600-1700. Silver lamé, gold, silver and silk embroidery, fringing braid.
Crown of Emperor Rudolf II, later crown of the Austrian Empire Jan Vermeyen goldsmith, Prague, 1602. Gold, enamel, diamonds, rubies, spinels, sapphires, pearls, velvet
Imperial orb for the crown Rudolf II. Andreas Osenbruck goldsmith, Prague, 1612-1615. Gold, enamel, diamonds, rubies, sapphire, pearls.
Sceptre for Emperor Matthias for the crown of Rudolf II. Andreas Osenbruck Goldsmith, Prague, 1615. Ainkhürn (narwhal tooth), gold, enamel, diamonds, rubies, sapphire, pearls.
Ceremonial robes of a Knight of the Hungarian Order of St Stephen, Vienna, c.1764. Velvet, fake ermine, gold and silver embroidery, gimped embroidery in gold.
Robes of a Knight of the Austrian Order of Leopold, Joseph Fisher (1769-1822), Vienna, c.1808. Gros de tours, fake ermine, gold embroidery, metal foil, ostrich feather, silk
Mantle of the Austrian Emperor, designed by Philipp von Stubenraüch (1784-1848), Vienna, c.1830. Velvet, gimped embroidery in gold, Paulette’s, gold braid, ermine and silk.
Robes of a Knight of the Austrian Order of the Cross, designer Philipp von Stubenraüch (1784-1948), Vienna 1815/16. Velvet, silver embroidery, leather silver embroidery.
Conronation vestments of the Kingdom of Lombardy and Venetia, Designer Philipp von Stubenraüch (1784-1848), Vienna, 1838. Velvet, gimped embroidery, gold, ermine, moiré, gold and silver embroidery.
The Robes worn by King of Bohemia as Elector, Vienna or Prague, c. 1625-1650… Mantle, gloves and matching ermine hat.
Jewellery Box of Empress Marie Louise, Paris, 1870, silver gilded velvet. Martin Guillaume Biennais (1764-1843) and Augustin Dupré (1748-1833).
Marie Louse, Empress of the French (1791-1847). Francois Pascal Simon Gerard, Paris, 1812, oil on canvas.
Cradle of the King of Rome, Paris, 1811. Silver gilded, gold, mother of pearl, velvet, silk, tuile, gold and silk embroidery. Designers and craftsmen: Pierre-Paul Prud’hon (1758-1823), Henri-Victor Roget (1758-1830), Jean-Baprise-Claude Odiot (1733-1850), Pierre-Philippe Thomire (1751-1843).
Ewer and Basin used for Imperial Baptisms, Spanish Master, 1571, gold and partly enamelled.
Egg Cup form the estate of King Louis XVI of France (1754-1793), Paris, c.1774/80. Silver gilded.
Family Tree showing Kings and Emperors from the House of Habsburg. Gold and chalcedonies. Tree: Vienna, 1725-30. Intaglios: Christoph Dorsch (1675-1732), Nuremberg, 1725/30/
Cameo showing the Portrait fo Emperor Franz I – Giovanni Beltrami (1777-1854). Made before 1840. Onyx, and enamelled gold.
Set of Jewels from the estate of Archduchess Sophie (1805-1872), Paris, 1809/19. Gold, silver, diamonds, emeralds, topazes.
Emerald Unguentarium, Dionysius Miseroni, Prague, c.1641. Emerald 2860 carat, enamelled gold. ‘As early as the 17th century the 2,680-carat emerald vessel was regarded as one of the most famous objects in the Imperial Treasury. The tremendous value of this unique showpiece, whose lid was cut out of the jewel’s interior, is illustrated by the story that Genoese jewellers declined to value it as security for a loan which Emperor Ferdinand III (1608-57) sought, avowing that they were not accustomed to dealing with such large pieces.’ Sadly the light in here is so bad, that I had to pluck an image off the internet.
Crown of Stefan Bocskay, Turkish, c.1605. Gold, precious stones, pearls and silk.
Case for the Crown of Stefan Bocskay, Turkish, c.1605. Fabric: Persian, c.1600, wood and silk.
The “Two Considerable Treasures” – Emperor Ferdinand I (1503-64) bequeathed to his successor, Emperor Maximilian II, two treasures of special importance: an enormous agate bowl (about 50cm across), and the “Ainkhürn” or unicorn horn. It was laid down that these two pieces would forever remain in the possession of the eldest male member of the family in perpetuity as ‘inalienable heirlooms’ and could not be sold or given as gifts.
Agate Bowl, Constantinople, 300-400AD. Carved from a single piece of agate.
“Ainkhürn”or Unicorn Horn. Ferdinand I received the “Ainkhürn” as a gift from King Sigismund II of Poland in 1540. During this age the mythical unicorn was thought to be an actual animal, which might only be captured in a virgin’s lap. The unicorn was thus regarded as an allegory of Christ, and its horn a symbol of divine power, from which secular dominion was derived. The horn, which was also thought to be an antidote to poison, was traded in Europe at tremendous prices. Only in the 17th century was it recognized that what had been believed to be unicorn’s horn was in fact the twisting tusk of the narwhal (Monodon monoceros).
Christophorus Relief, Upper Rhine, c.1475-1500, cast copper, gold-plated, glass stones.
Chalice from the Propety of Emperor Maximilian of Mexico. Circle of the Rondino Di Guerrino, Sienna, c.1375. Silver, gold plated copper, pit enamelled.
Late Gothic Chalice, Hungary, c.1500. Gold plated silver, gemstones.
Chalice with the Motto of Emperor Friedrich II, Southern Germany likely Nuremberg, 1438. Gold plated silver.
Blue Tunicella (Dalmatia), Palermo, Royal Court Workshop, 1125-1150. Silk, gold embroidery, small gold tubes, gold with cloisonné enamel, pearls, tablet weave.
The semi-circular Coronation Mantle of red silk was produced in Palermo in the 12th and early 13th centuries; with its depiction of a lion subduing a camel, the long, richly embroidered outer garments-blue tunicella and white alba-as well as shoes, stockings and gloves together with the belt reflect, (in part based on their inscriptions in part on other evidence), a connection with the Norman kings of Sicily. The overall design and elements of the decoration are derived from the court attire of Byzantine emperors. The older textiles probably came to the Empire through the Hohenstaufen emperor Henry VI. He married the Norman princess Constance in 1186 and became king of Sicily in 1194. In the empire they were apparently thought to be priestly vestments, used for coronations and complemented by additional textiles.
Coronation Mantle, Palermo, Royal Court Workshop, 1133/34. Samite silk, gold and silk embroidery, pearls, enamel, filigree, precious stones, tablet weave.
OMG… finally a chance to see this! I’ve been looking at pictures of these objects in books for nearly three decades. I can’t believe I get to see them in person.
The Eagle Dalmatic, South German, c.1330/40. Red silk twill damask, embroidery in silk, gold, small axinites.
The Stola (below) imitates a ‘loros’ an older type of textile of Byzantine or Norman origin. The six metre-long sash of yellow silk was decorated with black imperial eagles in medallions, only one of which has been preserved. Differently than the original manner of wearing the “loros”, in the medieval Holy Roman Empire the long sash was worn as a priest’s stola, that is forming a cross across the breast. This can be seen in Albrecht Dürer’s famous portrayal of Charlemagne (Room 11). The purple Dalmatic is embroidered with eagles and crowned heads. In this way the wearer of the garment is associated both with the heraldic beast of the Holy Roman Empire and his predecessors as king.
Alba, Palermo, Royal Court Workshop, c.1181 with later additions. Taffeta silk, Samite silk, fold wire embroidery, pearls, precious stones and tablet weave.
Stole, Italy, before 1328. Louise silk, gold threads, pearls, silver gilded appliqués with graduation, champlevé enamel and glass stones.
Imperial Cross, Western German, c.1030. Body: oak, precious stones, pearls, niello. Base: Prague, later additions c.1352, silver gilded enamel.
The Burse of St. Stephen, Carolingian, 800-833. Wooden body, gold, precious, stones, pearls.
Room full of extant herald’s tabards! Mostly 1700s, but just gorgeous.
Herald for the King-At-Arms and Herald of the Archduchy of Brabant, Brussels, c.1717. Embroiderer: Louis Almé. Velvet, gold lamé, appliqué, gold embroidery and fringing braid.
Herald’s Tabard for the King-At-Arms and Herald of the Duchy of Burgundy, Brussels, c.1600-1700. Velvet, silver lamê, fringing braid.
Tabard for a Herald of Maria Theresia (First King at Arms), Brussels, c.1742. Embroiderer: Eldens. Velvet, gold and silver lamé, appliqué, gold, silver and silk embroidery, gold braid.
Tabard for the First King-At-Arms of Archduke Albrecht, Sovereign of the Netherlands. Brussels, c.1599-1621. Velvet, gold and silver lamé, appliqué, gold silver and silk embroidery, fringing braid.
Emperor Maximilian I (1459-1519) – Bernhard Strigel (1460-1519), German, c.1500. Oil on Limewood.
Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy hoped to succeed Emperor Frederick Ill on the throne of the Holy Roman Empire. To achieve his aim, he assented to the marriage of his only daughter Mary to Archduke Maximilian, the emperor’s son and heir. The wedding, however, only took place after the duke’s death in 1477. Mary and Maximilian’s son Philip was born on 19 April 1478, ensuring the “Burgundian heritage” would ultimately remain with the House of Habsburg.
Mary, Duchess of Burgundy (1457-1482) – Francesco Terzio, Southern Germany, c. 1600 terracotta.
Tapestry Showing the arms of Emperor Charles V – weaver: Willem de Pannemaker, Brussels, c.1540. Wool, silk, gold and silver thread.
Tabard for the Stattholder First King-at-Arms, called Towson d’Or (Golden Fleece), Brussels c.1580. Velvet, gold and silver lamé, gold, silver and silk embroidery.
Order of the Golden Fleece Knight’s Chain, Burgundian-Netherlands, c.1435-1465. Gold and enamel.
Potence Chain of Arms of the Herald of the Order of the Golden Fleece, Netherlandish, c.1517. Gold and enamel.
This is one of the most beautiful heraldic objects I’ve never seen. I’ve admired it for years… never thought I’d be able o see it.
I am completely unapologetic for the amount photographs that I took and have added here!
Just when you think the Schatzkammer has delivered up all it’s treasures – the next room contains only some of *the* most famous embroidered objects ever created. I like did a double take when walking in… it was like the first time I saw the Cluny Tapestries all over again. They are so amazing and so beautifully preserved! Just fucking spectacular!
Liturgical Vestments of the Order of the Golden Fleece. Cope of the Virgin, Burgundian, c.1425-1440. Embroidery on linen, metal and silk threads, pearls, pastes (glass), velvet. Hood depicting the virgin.
Liturgical Vestments of the Order of the Golden Fleece. Dalmatic, Burgundian, c.1425-1440. Embroidery on linen, metal and silk threads, pearls and velvet.
Liturgical Vestments of the Order of the Golden Fleece. Cope of Christ (Pluvial), Burgundian, c.1425-1440. Embroidery on linen, metal and silk threads, pearls, pastes (glass), velvet. Hood depicting the Almighty.
Liturgical Vestments of the Order of the Golden Fleece. Casula, Burgundian, c.1425-1440. Embroidery on linen, metal and silk threads, pearls, pastes (glass), velvet.
Liturgical Vestments of the Order of the Golden Fleece. Cope of John the Baptist, Burgundian, c.1425-1440. Embroidery on linen, metal and silk threads, pearls, pastes (glass), velvet. Hood depicting John the Baptist.
Liturgical Vestments of the Order of the Golden Fleece. ABOVE: Antependium (rear panel), Burgundian, c.1425-1440; the Trinity, prophets and apostles. BELOW: Antependium (front panel), Burgundian, c.1425-1440; Mythical marriage of St Catherine Embroidery on linen, metal and silk threads, pearls, pastes (glass).
Phew! Man, I haven’t been a smoker since May 17th 1997… but damn, after that I need a cigarette and a good lie down. Back out in the Real World, I had to make do with some bratwurst and a Coke Zero! What an amazing visit! I think this has now officially out paced the Museé de Moyen Age as my favourite museum.
Our itinerary for Vienna (outside of Eurocup stuff) was to check out as many museums as possible; but it felt very much like you can’t take a trip to Vienna without going to the Schönbrunn.
Commissioned by Leopold I in 1696, it was designed and built to the preferred baroque architectural style at that time, it is heavy and ornate with large sweeping staircases and colonnades. It was intended as a summer palace and hunting lodge not far from the River Wein, and had several halting stages of construction (due to the lack of funds resultant from war with Spain among other Hapsburg trials). Emperor Charles VI gave it to his daughter Maria Theresia who was apparently particularly fond of the place, and it was she who left the largest mark on the estate.
I remember the palace really well from visiting here in 1995 and mostly remember that it was huge, ornate and we had a very cool guide showing us around. It was also a rather quiet place without too many tourists and not a lot of ropes or glass stopping you from interacting with the space (unlike my memories of Versailles that same trip). Everything was about the Empress Maria Theresia, her investment and design decisions regarding the estate and her prolific offspring that were wed to the various royal houses on the continent leading to her being named, the ‘Grandmother of Europe’. Her name was uttered with a thick Austrian accent numerous times in every single room!
Jesus has this place changed… thanks to the Netflix TV services, “Empress”, the entire palace now is all about Elizabeth – also known as, ‘Sisi’, who was married to the Emperor Franz Josef some one hundred years after Maria Theresia. Seriously, you could could be forgiven for leaving here thinking that Sisi built the place and was the only royal to have lived here! The free roaming tour with polite ‘please don’t touch the velvet wallpaper’ signs are gone, and in it’s place is a rigid, timed and structured audio tour keeping you in glass walkways well away from the artefacts. The palace was packed with visitors… though given it was late afternoon, I imagine it is even worse in the mornings.
Oh, and nice overpriced touristy carriage rides on offer around the grounds.
Still it is a lovely building and there is a lot to see here; having recently seen the over the top Nymphemberg Palace, among others, it does all start to feel a bit same-same, though.
The Billiard Room – ‘Franz Jospeh saw himself first and foremost as an officer of his army. Appropriately, the subject of the large format paintings in this room is the Military Order of Maria Theresa, the highest military order of merit of of the Habsburg Monarchy.’ Which was pointed out on the audio-tour… but possibly ignored as everyone is here to hear about Sisi!
Audience Chamber – Here the various emperors received individuals who had been granted a private audience with the monarch. Members of the government, high ranking military officers and court officials were also summoned here several times a week to deliver their reports.
Emperor Franz Joseph’s (aka Sisi’s husband) Study – A host of personal pictures and photographs bear witness to the style of interior favoured by the emperor in his private quarters. Over the course of his long life he amassed in this room a wealth of mementos of his wife Elisabeth (Sisi), their four children and thirteen grandchildren.’
Ketterl Room – the concealed door in the back wall of the study leads into the valet de chambre’s rooms. I’m not sure what a Ketterl is…
Franz Joseph’s Bedroom – the emperor’s bedroom was also where he died on November 21, 1916. The brown is a bit… meh.
Stairs Cabinet – the Stairs Cabinet served Empress Elisabeth as a writing room. Here she wrote her letters, journals and her poetry. The bookcase still contains part of her personal library apparently.
Dressing Room – immediately adjacent to the bedroom, the dressing room was the innermost and most private room in the empress’s apartments. Sisi was known to have a strict diet and beauty regimen to maintain her girlish figure and look after her ankle length hair.
Imperial Couple’s Bedroom – the bedroom in the Italian style that was shared by Franz Joseph and Sisi was furnished and decorated as we see it now, for their marriage in 1854.
Salon of Empress Elisabeth – this was Sisi’s primary reception room. “The Rococo Revival interior is a typical example of the furnishing and decoration of a state room at the Viennese court during the reign of Emperor Franz Joseph.”… and is way too chintzy for me.
Marie Antoinette Room – during the time when Elisabeth occupied these apartments, the Marie Antoinette Room was used as the family dining room for small dinners in the immediate family circle and attended by the imperial couple and their children, and later on their daughter and sons-in-law and grandchildren. So, like a casual breakfast nook really.
Yellow Salon – the Yellow Salon is the first room in the apartments facing the palace gardens. From the windows of these rooms one has a stunning view of the main parterre with the Gloriette as the lofty termination of the vista. <- I did not write that.
Balcony Room – continuing numerous pictures of Maria Theresa and her numerous children. The portraits are from the the studio of court painter Martin van Meytens. This was quite a nice room actually.
Breakfast Cabinet – this little corner room owes its ‘pleasing character’ (according to the audio) to the textile flower pictures set into the wall panelling in gilt frames. It’s lovely, but so delicate and feminine. I think trying to relax in these spaces would just put me on edge.
Salon of the Arch Duchess Portraits – this room is done in a Rococo Revival decor and once belonged to the apartments occupied by Empress Elizabeth. Today it contains the famous portraits of Maria Theresa’s daughters, and is therefore also sometimes known as the Children’s Room.
Large Rosa Room – the three Rosa Rooms are named after the artist Joseph Rosa, who executed fifteen landscaping paintings for the ensemble at the behest of Maria Theresa in the 1760s. See, Maria Theresa did all the work, and somehow Sisi is now the belle of the ball!
Second Small Rosa Room – consisting of one large room and two adjoining smaller room, the Rosa Rooms form an ensemble with a cohesive decor plan.
Great Gallery – Okay, this is pretty great still. It is 43 metres long, and just shy of 10 metres wide, the Great Gallery was the used as an ideal setting for courtly events. The interior is dripping with magnificent gilt stucco decorations and ceiling frescos represents the epitome of Rococo art – which is fabulous, if you like that sort of thing.
Okay, I love the chandeliers! Want one at home, though it may be hard to manoeuvre around given the high ceiling in my house is only about 14’.
Round Chinese Cabinet – half concealed to either side of the Small Gallery lie two highlights among the historic state rooms of the palace; two cabinets lying opposite each other in mirror-image, both decorated with a rich array of works of art from China and Japan… though it ends up being subtlely chinoiserie, as it’s all surrounded in those heavy Rococo frames.
Small Gallery – crossing the central axis of the palace, the Small Gallery, together with the two smaller rooms on either side, made for small salons used for intimate courtly entertainment. I still can’t imagine living in a place like this, how do you decide which room is appropriate for a game of Code Names?
Oval Chinese Cabinet:
Hall of Ceremonies – at the court of Maria Theresa the Hall of Ceremonies served as the Second or Great Antechamber. Here, enthroned under a canopy of state, she received her guests in audience. Today this place is occupied by probably the most famous portrait of Maria Theresa, showing her as the ‘First Lady of Europe’ in a sumptuous gown of Brabant lace. Sumptuous – good word.
Vieux Laque Room – in terms of its art-historical significance, the Vieux Laque Room is apparently among the most important interiors of the Schönbrunn. The black lacquer panels from China lend the room an impression of decadence and magnificence.
Needs more gilt…
Napoleon Room – known today as the Napoleon Room, the room was refurbished several times during the 19thC. When it was restored in 2007 the decision was taken to highlight various phases of its past decoration and make this visible to visitors. I don’t know why it’s called the Napoleon Room, they didn’t say?!
Porcelain Room – this small room served as Maria Theresa’s private writing room. It has a particularly private character and was decorated to her personal tastes apparently. The decor not only displays the empress’s love of the chinoiserie fashion of the times but was partly made by members of her family – it interestingly the most monochromatic area in the entire place, but still full of baroque clutter. .
Millions Rooms – the interior of the Millions Room (named for the Indo-Persian works attached to the walls) is particularly extravagant. In the ceremonial sequence of rooms prescribed for the Viennese court, Maria Theresa used this room, originally known as the Mirrors Room, to receive guests for private audiences. Okay, so the house is definitely all still about Maria Theresa – so why is the advertising, posters, website and gift shop all about Sisi?
Gobelin Salon – both the walls and the armchairs in this room are covered in valuable tapestries; the backs of the seats of the six chairs each show representations together with the signs of the Zodiac… it’s pretty flash.
Red Salon – known today as the Red Salon, this room is decorated in the style typical of the later years of Emperor Franz Jospeh’s reign. The room is characterised by the wall hangings and upholstery in ‘court damask’, a red silk damask with a design based on a pineapple like central motif.
Rich Room. The Rich Room does its name full justice, on display here is Maria Theresa’s state bed with its lavishly embroidered covers and hanging. Love it!
Salon of Archduke Franz Karl – a glass door allows a view into the corner salon, which is decorated with life-size portraits of Maria Theresa’s children.
I didn’t take a lot of photos of the corridors and staircases (I say staircases for there are several!), but there are plenty of statuary placed around the common areas of the palace, much of which doesn’t have any plaques informing visitors of the artist or the content. Though this one is most likely Hercules defeating the Lion.
All up a cool, slightly confusing visit to the Shönbrunn… I wish I had taken some pictures of the gift shop and the posters around the palace that were all, ‘Sisi this, Sisi that!’ Poor Maria Theresa, how was she to know she would need a better post humours PR machine 300 years after her death. Netflix, you have a lot to answer for!