On Rape Culture.

I think you’re misunderstanding the term “rape culture”, Scott. People like you try and dismiss it because they feel like it means women are getting raped in their millions, or there are rape TV shows and rape rape parties where everyone talks about how much they like to rape.

Rape culture actually refers to simple facts. Women are raped at a rate or sexually assaulted at a rate of something like 1 in 4. One in FOUR. Now, you can argue that fact all you like. People don’t like that statistic and challenge it all the time… but what if it’s true? What if it’s LITERALLY FACTUALLY TRUE? What if instead of dismissing and arguing it we thought “Holy fucking fuck that is fucked up and needs to stop.”

Rape culture refers to the fact that if a woman is a victim of rape, she can’t tell anyone. If you tell people your house was broken into, they don’t ask what you were wearing. If you are a victim of rape, everything is suddenly relevant: have you been drinking? Why were you drinking? Had you had too much? Oh, so you DID let him kiss you? So you led him on? What were you wearing?

Rape culture refers to the fact that women who are victims of rape are often victimised a second time by the police. If someone is raped it’s extremely difficult to prosecute. The difference between consent and rape is purely one word against another. Police know this. They know how hard it is to make any case. They also have their own attitudes, that reflect society – that a rapist is a creepy guy in a black van who grabs women. Not a good looking guy on a date who doesn’t think a goodnight kiss is enough.

Rape culture refers to the fact that a when a girl is victimised, gang raped by young men, the media will actually sometimes refer to the boys like they’re victims. “These two young men who had such promising futures — star football players, very good students — literally watched as they believed their life fell apart,” Note that this was CNN, and they were referring to the RAPISTS, not the victims.

Rape culture refers to the pervasive concept that the bodies of women are something for men to aspire to and that we deserve.

Rape culture refers to the fact that women are wolf-whistled at, cat-called and groped not just regularly but routinely. This might not sound like rape, and it isn’t – it’s part of rape CULTURE. It’s the fact that women’s bodily autonomy isn’t respected. It’s the first step.

Rape culture refers to the fact that everyone is opposed to rape. But lots of men think that it’s ok to pressure a woman, or that a man is owed something if he buys a drink, or that a woman sometimes says no but means yes, or that once you start she gets into it or that it’s not rape if it’s your wife, or that she’s totally down for it when she’s been drinking, or that “rape allegations” are just women having regrets, or that… lots of similar things.

Rape culture isn’t “the culture of rape”. Rape culture is the culture that supports rape. It’s the culture that denies rape is even happening. That it’s even a problem. That it needs to be talked about.

Rape__by_little_pretty

Published with permission from Matt Burgess via Facebook.

Joe Hockey’s Acme Inflatable Hostage

Joe Hockey’s Acme Inflatable Hostage
 by Jacinta Reid

So now the Abbott government is all about medical research? After getting rid of the Science Minister, after ensuring that an education in medicine (or any other discipline) will cost vastly more, after throwing hospital funding under a bus, after closing down a whole bunch of government departments and offices and stripping enough money from scientific organisations to fund … well, to fund moderate levels of scientific advancement in a nation of 22 million people, now they are keen for medical research to be well funded into the future?

Nah. Sorry. Not buying it.

The “Medical Research Future Fund” is a prop. It’s a common plot device in so many crime movies; the bad guy holding a gun to a hostage’s head and saying “give me what I want or the blonde gets it”. A pretty, innocent hostage with sympathetic appeal and pleading eyes. The kind of hostage that the audience would think that any hero worth their salt would be heartless and unethical not to choose to protect at any cost.

The Medical Research Future Fund is that hostage. Straight from Central Casting. Nobody is going to say that medical research funding isn’t a good thing. And anyone arguing against the GP Co-payment will run up against the hostage situation, and find that members of the Coalition will jump up and down shouting “Why do you hate medical research funding!!?” Oh the irony. And more irony, in case you were irony deficient; much medical research shows that preventive medicine and picking up ailments for early treatment not only leads to better health outcomes, it costs the nation less. So the Coalition wants to kill off universal healthcare for idealogical reasons, and it says it’s doing it because the rising cost of healthcare is unsustainable. And it’s planning to achieve this sustainable healthcare by implementing a user-pays system that demostrably, where it is implemented around the world, costs taxpayers more than universal healthcare. (And results in lots of preventable deaths, to boot.)

But whenever anyone points out the absurdity of adopting a failed strategy, Hockey whips out a pack labelled “Medical Research Future Fund” pulls the auto-inflate rip-cord and presto! The perfect hostage! Then he says “Give me what I want or I’ll kill Bambi!” or, in other words “Let me end Universal Health Care or you will be responsible for the loss of the Medical Research Future Fund!”

It’s a cruel and transparent ruse, your Acme inflatable hostage. I’m pretty sure if I read the fine print on the box it would say “Not to be used as a lifesaving device, always use under adult supervision.” And every bit of new information that comes out about it inflicts another puncture. Science advisor wasn’t consulted? Pffft. Not planned until a few weeks before the budget? Fffffft! No idea how the funds willl be allocated? Pthbthbthtt!

Sorry, Mr Hockey, but as nice as it would be to have a twenty billion dollar fund to support medical research into the future, I would prefer to maintain medical and science funding more broadly, and keep the existing healthcare system that lets Australian people, whatever their income, put to use the fruits of the good, well established research we already have.

hockey over